CatDat

Implication Details

Assumptions: cofiltered limitsextensiveterminal object

Conclusions: cocartesian cofiltered limits

Reason: Let C\mathcal{C} be an extensive category with cofiltered limits and a terminal object. Then the coproduct functor C×CC/1×C/1C/(1+1)\mathcal{C} \times \mathcal{C} \cong \mathcal{C}/1 \times \mathcal{C}/1 \to \mathcal{C}/(1+1) is an equivalence. The forgetful functor C/AC\mathcal{C}/A \to \mathcal{C} creates connected limits, and hence preserves cofiltered limits. For every XCX \in \mathcal{C} the functor (X,):CC×C(X,-) : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C} \times \mathcal{C} also preserves cofiltered limits. The composition of these functors is X:CCX \sqcup - : \mathcal{C} \to \mathcal{C} and therefore also preserves cofiltered limits.